Dr. Peter David Beter - Audio Letter No. 07.
"AUDIO LETTER(R)" is a registered trademark of Audio Books,
Inc., a Texas corporation, which originally produced this tape
recording. Reproduced under open license granted by Audio
Books, Inc.


Hello, everybody, this is Dr. Beter. Today is December 21,
1975, and this is my monthly AUDIO LETTER(R) No. 7.

As I celebrate Christmas with my family a few days from now, I
will be thanking God for the precious gift He has given to all of
us this year--the gift of time; because, my friend, the year
1975, even as difficult and trying as it has been, was a year of
reprieve due to delays in the timetable of the Four Rockefeller
Brothers. At this very moment, some important parts of their
plan are as much as one year behind schedule; and in the
meantime, more and more Americans have been awakening to the
truth of what is going on. Yes, we have been granted a little
more time than we might have had to respond to the menace we all
face, but we dare not relax and waste whatever time we have left.
The Four Rockefeller Brothers are working feverishly to make up
for lost time.

Overseas, the way is being paved for war, including that
nightmare the world has feared for 30 years--NUCLEAR WAR. Here
at home, our economic woes are getting worse while a corrupt
government, controlled by the Rockefeller Brothers, tells us
'Prosperity is just around the corner.'

Preparations for the dictatorial new Rockefeller Constitution
keep marching on; and the man who has conspired for 20 years to
become our first Dictator, Nelson Aldrich Rockefeller, stands
poised at the threshold ready to seize the presidency. That is
why it is so important that more and more alert Americans are now
asking just one question: "What can I do?"

I am convinced that now, at last, there are enough of us to
launch a successful rescue of our great, free Republic.
Therefore I have just unveiled a strategy for action which I
truly believe can and will save our country. It is a strategy
which you, as an individual, can undertake starting right where
you are. It uses the powers you are granted by the most basic
law of the land--our present United States CONSTITUTION; and if
you will faithfully do your part, you can rest assured others all
over America will be doing theirs too. The result, IF WE WILL
EACH DO OUR OWN PART, is a plan of action which, in my opinion,
cannot be stopped. This entire plan of action is presented in a
new AUDIO BOOK recorded December 15, 1975, and it's entitled:
"WHAT WE CAN DO TO SAVE AMERICA", and it is my answer to the
question, "What can I do?"

The challenge before us, my friend, is to regain control of
the government that belongs to us, and we must act quickly before
that control, which is already in the hands of the Rockefeller
Brothers, slips forever beyond our reach.

CONTROL--that is the word, more than any other, that sums up
the actions of the Four Rockefeller Brothers. Control is both
the end toward which they work and the means by which they extend
their reach still further--control of money and of government,
control of industry and of Big Labor, control of natural
resources and of human resources.

The incredible financial wealth of the Rockefellers is
actually nothing more than a result of this insatiable drive for
control; and it grows continuously due to their control over your
money, your resources, your labor, and your government. They
believe they have a right to do all these things because they are
convinced that they have been divinely ordained to rule the
world. So, for example, using the CIA for their own private
purposes is right and proper, according to their concept of
themselves as America's royal family. It matters not what you
and I think, only they know best. All of this and much more is
made clear in the book that was written for them as their Mein
Kampf in 1930, "THE AMERICAN RICH" by Hoffman Nickerson.

Today I want to discuss three topics that point out some of
the fruits of such control by the Rockefeller Brothers:




Topic #1--In their drive for control, the Rockefellers are trying
to snare us all in their giant trap, catch us so that we cannot
wrestle free or fight back; but they know that if they move too
quickly we may notice what they are up to, and react to protect
ourselves. So they have been moving with great patience and
determination over a period of several decades to get their trap
assembled and in place ready to spring it on all of us. To
understand what is really happening, therefore, you should do as
they do: look at long spans of time, compress them in your mind,
and see where things are really headed.

Gradualism is the tactic now being used--while TV, Sports, and
other distractions are being used to focus people's attention
away from what is really happening. Thus, even while many people
find the idea of a new Constitution for America preposterous,
many of its provisions are already being put in place, ready for
ratification by a National Referendum in the near future. The
federal government already regards the United States as divided
up into 10 REGIONS, the forerunners of the 10 so-called "New
States." The Federal Election Commission, along with some other
activities, is the forerunner of the Electoral branch, and so on.
So keep your eye on their objective--that is, the direction in
which they are moving events, so that you won't be fooled by
their shifts in timing to meet their various contingency plans.

The secret new Constitution, which was developed over a
10-year period to fit the outline laid down personally by Nelson
Rockefeller himself, just as he did our present 25th
Amendment--this secret new Constitution is coming sooner or
later, unless we stop it once and for all! As former Senator Sam
Ervin said so emphatically just a few days ago, and I quote:

"We don't need a new Constitution. Ours has weathered many
storms in the past 200 years. It was written to last for the

But, my friend, if we leave the Rockefeller machine in control
of our government, our communications media, and our economy, we
will have a dictatorial new Constitution!

Senator Ervin is quoted as saying something else too, and it
is supremely ironic. Concerning Richard Nixon he said, quote:

"He had the most pronounced, aggravated notion about the powers
of the presidency. He envisioned the President as being
something of an absolute monarch."

However well these words may have applied to Nixon, they apply
far better to the man who made, used, and then unmade Nixon--that
is, Nelson Rockefeller.

Perhaps Senator Ervin himself now realizes how cleverly he was
used in the Watergate coup d'etat, since he said last spring, and
I quote:

"If I had known then what I know now, I would never have voted
to confirm Nelson Rockefeller."

Whenever possible the Rockefeller Brothers maneuver people
into doing what they want done without their puppets even being
aware of it--not, at least, until later. But the Rockefeller
style also includes more solid avenues of control over all sides,
if possible, in every arena including that of politics. Thus,
for example, the Rockefellers have their hooks equally deep into
both the Democratic and Republican Parties as well as fringe
political fronts, both left and right. And while they have often
found it advantageous to maintain a so-called Liberal image with
their public relations they are not true Liberals, any more than
certain of their lackeys who wear the Conservative label are true
Conservatives. As Nelson Rockefeller himself said in Dallas on
September 12, 1975, and I quote:

"Conservative and Liberal to me are misleading as labels."

These and other similar labels have completely lost any
utility they may once have had, thanks to their control by the
Rockefeller Brothers. Their only true loyalty is to themselves,
and that transcends all of the conventional boundaries of
political affiliation.

A perfect example of Rockefeller control of all sides of a
political situation is before us right now in the alleged
Presidential campaign. I say "alleged" because there is no doubt
at all as to the outcome under the Rockefeller scenario.
Instead, the game is being played for other reasons. For the
moment the most prominent players on the stage are four:
Humphrey, Reagan, Ford, and his ventriloquist Rockefeller.

Hubert Humphrey wears a big label that reads "Liberal Democrat",
while the equally large label on Ronald Reagan reads
"Conservative Republican." President Ford's label is a large
question mark.

Nelson Rockefeller's label which, by the way, is made of solid
gold, is rather large. It reads: "Liberal New Deal Democrat
turned instant Conservative Republican."

It looks like quite a field, doesn't it? But it so happens that
Nelson Rockefeller has the other three in the palm of his hand
and his own label is only for show.

Hubert Humphrey is currently the beneficiary of the so-called
'Humphrey phenomenon'--an undeclared candidacy that is being made
to look impressive by the Rockefeller major media and by polls
which can easily be manipulated. Humphrey's well concealed
control of a huge major multinational oil company for over 20
years has been very helpful to his Rockefeller supporters behind
the scenes. Partly for this reason, a possible
multimillion-dollar tax case against him by the Internal Revenue
Service has been covered up under Presidential seal, and the
IRS-FBI agents who worked on the case are no longer around!

Ronald Reagan, of course, is the polished actor who has been
rehearsing so-called Conservative lines ever since 1950. That
was the year when, during Congressional hearings, he officially
admitted his previously ultra-Liberal activities but claimed that
he had seen the light and was turning over a new leaf. Yet his
actions, as sharply distinguished from his words, have never
really changed. He has maintained many active ties with
Rockefeller-dominated organizations, such as their complex of
governmental-controlled groups known collectively as "1313" in
Chicago. The Reagan administration in California was heavily
populated with people from the Rockefeller stables and the Reagan
record in California parallels that of Rockefeller in New York in
many ways, but Reagan has consistently spoken as if his views and
policies were totally opposite to those of Rockefeller. Reagan's
service on Rockefeller's CIA cover-up commission earlier this
year, therefore, helped to quiet the cover-up fears of some who
are not aware of Reagan's strong Rockefeller ties.

President Ford is where he is because then-President Nixon
double-crossed his boss Nelson Rockefeller. When Agnew was
forced to resign, Nixon was supposed to nominate Rockefeller; but
Nixon could see where that would lead, so instead he selected
Gerald Ford, whose political star had risen considerably after
his participation in the work and defense of the Warren
Commission. Good old 'Jerry' was well known and well liked by
his colleagues, yet his confirmation hearings bogged down
unexpectedly. Behind the scenes Nelson Rockefeller applied the
brakes until Ford agreed to nominate him (Rockefeller) upon
Nixon's departure from the presidency. Once the agreement was
reached, Ford's confirmation hearings rapidly concluded
favorably. And Nelson Rockefeller immediately resigned as
Governor of New York, surreptitiously moved into his Washington,
D.C. residence, and personally finished Watergating Nixon out of
the White House. Nelson was so proud of his success in this
project that he wrote to a banker friend in Mexico afterward to
tell him all about it. Can you imagine?

Thus Rockefeller control denies us any real choice in national
politics. Ultimately the Rockefellers choose all the
presidential candidates that count--and have ever since Woodrow
Wilson's time. We, the voters, are then given the useless
privilege of choosing which of their hand-picked puppets we want,
just like they do in Soviet Russia. Even in the election itself,
the deck is stacked in favor of their preferred choice. But,
just in case, they control the other side too. If this isn't

In Congress, too, most of our politicians end up in the
Rockefeller pocket one way or another. Some deliberately throw
in their lot with the Rockefellers and become active Rockefeller
agents. Others become compromised by skeletons in their closets,
and are pawns in the Rockefeller game of blackmail and
double-cross here in Washington. And still others just go along
to get along, not rocking the boat. And so when government
abuses become so flagrant that they are detected, we are still
left without recourse because the Rockefellers control the
investigations in almost every case.

As I speak to you, the ante has gone up due to the leakage of
radioactive plutonium-239 super poison from the Bullion
Depository at Fort Knox, and the government is doing nothing
whatsoever to stop it! My previous information was that the
region which has been primarily affected by the leakage over the
past several years consists of a swath through Kentucky, my home
state of West Virginia, and Virginia with a combined population
of over 9-million people. But on November 8, 1975, a secret
meeting was held in the White House to discuss alternative means
of disposing of the deadly poison. The discussion included some
ideas that would be as insane as the poison itself--such as
dumping all 60 pounds of it into the underground streams that lie
under Fort Knox. Not only might this allow the poison to spread
uncontrollably from there, but it could possibly also cause
contamination of any of the huge underground caverns under Fort
Knox which are used for natural gas storage. Now if this were to
happen, natural gas could carry traces of the radioactive
plutonium poison straight into the industrial plants and homes of
thousands of people in that area. The deadly plutonium radiation
would be unaffected by passing through gas flames, after which it
could be inhaled or set on to food.

I received no further information concerning the action, if
any, taken at the November 8 White House meeting; but I have
received updated information to the effect that the poison is now
spreading throughout the entire Southeast of the United States
and even beginning to enter the Gulf of Mexico. Thirty-six
million Americans are now at stake. And what is our government
doing about it? Nothing. The White House meeting had only one
purpose: to save face for the wrongdoers, not to save 36-million

And what about Congress? And all those investigations we keep
hearing about? Consider Senator Frank Church who is our newest
presidential candidate. On November 20, 1975, he explained the
release of his Committee's report about assassination plots on
foreign leaders with the words, and I quote: "The people were
entitled to know what went wrong, and why." But when it comes to
an immediate deadly danger to all of us caused by the same
elements of the Intelligence community, apparently Senator Church
believes we are not entitled to know, since he has been covering
up this vital information now for four months while the situation
grows steadily worse. And for over two months the same has been
true of his counterpart in the House--Congressman Otis Pike.

Meanwhile what else is happening in the Executive Branch,
specifically the Treasury Department? My friend, I believe it is
time to let you in on an example of the evasions, half truths,
and distortions which Rockefeller bureaucrats use to cover their
tracks. I call it a lesson in bureaucratic gobbledygook, the
slippery language that some people also call double talk.

For over three months now, all of our attempts even to
communicate directly with the government about the twin disasters
at Fort Knox have met with nothing but a very loud silence.
Having deepened and confirmed their own guilt time and again
through various slips in the past, they apparently no longer have
the courage or the courtesy even to answer us! Through an
indirect channel, however, we were able to extract a letter from
Mrs. Mary Brooks, the Director of the Mint, dated November 21,
1975. This indirect channel is Congressman Kenneth Robinson of
Virginia who, while he does not choose to pursue the Fort Knox
matter on his own, has at least cooperated with us in ways such
as this. In this regard, he is exceptional. No one else in the
entire United States Congress has done even this much.

As I read the letter try, if you can, to find any clear-cut
YES or NO type answer to anything. You will only find one to the
effect that a certain statement, and I quote: "is simply not
true." But the statement referred to is not our statement but a
carefully selected misstatement of our charges by someone else.
Now here's the letter:

"Dear Mr. Robinson:

Thank you for your letter of November 10, 1975, concerning
allegations that plutonium-239 was stored in the so-called
Central Core Vault at the United States Bullion Depository, Fort
Knox, Kentucky.

We do not store plutonium-239 or any other radioactive
substance at the Depository, and have no reason to believe that
it is stored there by other government agencies. We authorized
the Military at Fort Knox to make radiation tests in the
Depository last week. We were informed that the tests did not
disclose any evidence of radioactive material.

The allegations relating to the so-called Central Core Vault
are carried in a Swiss Newsletter entitled 'Myers Finance and
Energy' that is currently being circulated by those who have
persisted with all the wild allegations about the Bullion
Depository at Fort Knox. The Newsletter discusses Dr. Peter D.
Beter's allegations and states (and the letter quotes as

'In 1942-43 Major Stanley Tatom designed and oversaw the
construction of a Central Core Vault below the Main Vault. To
get to this ultrasafe vault, an elevator had to be installed and
it used up the space occupied by 12 of the former Vault
compartments. This explains why the numbering in the Vault
compartments upstairs had a 12-digit gap.'"

And Mrs. Brooks' letter continues, and I quote:

"This statement is simply not true. There were no major
alterations to the Vault after construction of the Depository was
completed in 1936. The elevator was installed at the time the
Depository was constructed. We have no record of Major Stanley
Tatom designing or overseeing the construction of a Central Core
Vault. In fact we do not, and find no record that we ever did,
refer to any part of the Depository by that name.

The Visitors Log at the Depository does show the name of Major
Daniel F. Tatum as calling on the officer in charge on July 29,
1942. We also have records which show that a steel door was
erected by the Champion Wire & Iron Works, Louisville, Kentucky,
at the entrance to the corridor that leads to Compartments
numbered 1 through 14 in the basement level of the Depository.
This work was completed on January 7, 1942, and the No. 15 was
assigned to the door. After this work was completed, gold was
stored in the corridor for a time during which the door was
locked and sealed."

Still quoting from her letter:

"The allegation that there is a 12-digit gap in the numbering
of compartments is also inaccurate. Our records show that the
Depository had 28 compartments, 14 on the lower level and 14 on
the upper level at the time of construction. The compartments on
the lower level were numbered 1 through 14, and the corridor door
was numbered 15 when it was added in 1942. The compartments on
the upper level were numbered 21 through 34. There is no record
of the numbers 16 through 20 ever being used on Vault
compartments of the Depository.

If I could be of further assistance in this matter, please let
me know.


and there follows the signature of

"Mary Brooks,
Director of the Mint."

My friend, letters like this one are the product of a year and
a half of continuous effort on their part to refine their story
and put their very best foot forward. They are written with
great care, with careful choice of every word. The letter I have
just read to you, in fact, was not even written by Mary Brooks
alone. Much of it was written by an official in the General
Accounting Office who has ties to the Intelligence industry. The
GAO itself is implicated in the Fort Knox cover-up through the
falsified Gold Audit done in the fall of 1974, so this letter is
important, and it deserves closer examination.

First: Why does the Government deliberately go so far out of
its way, to Switzerland no less, to find someone else's
misstatement of the Bullion Depository modifications so that they
can attack that instead of refuting our own statements? If they
can refute our actual charges, why don't they do it? I invite
the Government to listen to my monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 2 for
July 1975 and respond to that, not someone else's secondhand
statements. As I clearly stated then, the Central Core Vault was
built into the Depository at the start. Major Tatom's job later
on was to build a rapid retrieval system into the Gold Vault, not
to build the Vault itself. I also explained that there is a gap
of six digits, not 12, on each floor of Vault compartments.

My friend, the Government is acutely aware of my real charges,
so why don't they answer them? What do you think?

Notice also, in trying to wave aside references to Major
Stanley Tatom, how cleverly it is done! We can prove that he was
there and did oversee the work on the rapid retrieval system, and
apparently the Government knows we can. Therefore the following
sentence is used to mislead without actually lying, and I quote:

"We have no record of Major Stanley Tatom designing or
overseeing the construction of a Central Core Vault."

Of course they don't, because that is just not what he did. He
built a rapid retrieval system to give access to the Central Core
Vault. The writers of the letter included one other item which
was intended to help throw everyone off the track, but actually
does just the opposite. According to our own sources, during the
work on the rapid retrieval system in 1942-43, the disruption was
so great that the gold was taken out of the Central Core Vault
and, quote: "piled around in the corridors." Now we are told in
this letter about the strange corridor door, which was installed
for unstated reasons. Listen again to these astonishing words
from Mrs. Brooks' letter, and I quote:

"This work was completed on January 7, 1942, and the No. 15 was
assigned to the door. After this work was completed, gold was
stored in the corridor for a time during which the door was
locked and sealed."

Mrs. Brooks does not tell us for how long a time, much less why!
But thanks to our own information, she doesn't have to tell us.

I suggest that you replay Mrs. Brooks' letter all the way
through and see for yourself what you will pick up. For example,
listen to all the assertions and denials that are all couched in
the words, quote: "Our records show ..." or "We have no
record..."--this coming from the same office whose records are so
suspect in other ways.

Records of the quality of gold stored in Fort Knox and
elsewhere, as I have revealed on other occasions, have disagreed
with one another in glaring ways. The official Mint records omit
shipments we can prove from Fort Knox. Even the case of the
missing experimental aluminum pennies that has erupted lately is
another example of the 'dependability' of United States Mint

But notice also that the letter spends the least time on the
most important matter of all--the radioactive plutonium poison
stored in the Central Core Vault. It is stated that the
radiation tests by the Military, quote: "...did not disclose any
evidence of radioactive material." In much the same vein, and
with similar bureaucratic phrases like, quote: "We have no
evidence...", the Kentucky Department of Human Resources claims
that there is nothing to worry about. But, my friend, plutonium
radiation is very hard to detect, yet very deadly if it gets
inside your body. Experts sum it up with the phrase:

"If there is enough plutonium to detect, it is already too

Therefore nothing less than a serious, comprehensive, honest
check by top experts with the best equipment available can be
considered satisfactory. The stakes for over 36-million
Americans in the Southeast United States are too high to settle
for less. The United States Government expects you to just take
their word for it regardless of what they may tell you. No
proof, no criteria, just believe what they say.


Well, my friend, I do not ask you to do that. I am now going
to issue a challenge to the federal government either to confirm
or refute my charges about the plutonium poison leaking from the
Bullion Depository at Fort Knox--openly, fairly, and
conclusively. Furthermore, I am going to state clearly what my
criteria are for a test of my charges that I believe the American
people could accept and believe in.

Here specifically is what I propose:

First, formation of a truly blue-ribbon committee to test for
plutonium poison leakage from the Bullion Depository at Fort
Knox, this committee to consist of scientists, recognized
authorities fully qualified for such a task. If my challenge is
accepted, the committee must include certain individuals whose
names I will reveal at that time. The Government may nominate an
equal number of scientists to the committee. However, my
nominees will be men who are not my employees or associates; and
likewise any members of the committee nominated by the Government
must not be federal employees unless my own information indicates
that they can be trusted. In other words, the committee must be
independent and totally unbiased.

Second, this committee is to be given complete authority and
discretion over the conduct of the plutonium poison
investigation. They are to be provided at federal government
expense with any and all technical assistance they may request as
well as the most up-to-date and effective instrumentation. This
must include the 1026 multichannel analyzer and any other devices
they may specify. They must also have the right by majority vote
of the committee to add other experts to their investigating
committee if they deem it necessary. They are not to be
interfered with or limited in any way. Should federal or other
authorities choose to impose limitations, the investigating
committee shall be empowered to immediately state any objections
they may have to these limitations over live nation-wide
television and radio so that their message cannot be edited out
or reinterpreted by anyone else.

Third: Upon completion of their investigation, the investigating
committee shall be granted up to one hour of live broadcast time
on nation-wide radio and television to present their findings,
and also their recommendations if my charges are confirmed. I am
willing to accept their conclusion as final if it is unanimous,
and the federal government must agree to do the same.

- - - - - - -

There is no time to be lost. If you agree that my proposal is
reasonable, start passing the word and applying public opinion
pressure to make it happen. Otherwise the ever-expanding control
exercised by the Rockefeller Brothers will prevent it. It is UP
TO YOU, because the once free, once great major media in America
are being gobbled up ever more completely by the Rockefellers.

Their latest victim is the mighty Hearst publishing empire,
whose publications reach a total audience of nearly 86-million
adults. This take-over is the bottom line in the tragic Patty
Hearst case involving the CIA-financed SLA. A stock transfer to
a tax-free Foundation controlled by the Rockefellers was the
objective, and it has now been accomplished.

It's sad that we have to look overseas to see any meaningful
reporting about the Fort Knox plutonium disaster. In the
Financial Times of London for Thursday December 11, 1975, the
story was broken by C. Gordon Tether whose financial column is
read the world over. In his article titled "A NEW TWIST OF FORT
KNOX SAGA", he reviews the Fort Knox Gold Scandal cover-up and
then informs his readers of the latest charges concerning
plutonium. He ends the article with words that no columnist of
his stature in America has yet dared to write, and I quote:

"But whatever the cost in terms of loss of face, might not the
United States authorities be well advised to do whatever is
necessary to demonstrate that there is no Ft. Knox cover-up? In
the light of what is happening in the United States during the
past few years, deeds inevitably now speak louder than words; and
the refusal to prove that they have nothing to hide is inevitably
destined to go on fostering precisely the opposite impression."

Topic #2--On December 11, 1975, New York City went into default.
Hundreds of millions of dollars in City notes came due on that
day, and the City did not pay as promised. A DEFAULT is nothing
more or less than a failure to pay, and that's exactly what
happened. "But wait a minute", you may say. "President Ford
announced that he would ask Congress to give New York City
2.3-billion dollars in loans because New York bailed itself out.
What's going on here?"

What is going on, my friend, is just another Rockefeller shell
game. New York City has declared a three-year moratorium, so
called, on payment of 1.6-billion dollars of City notes. Anyone
holding one of those notes cannot cash it in for three years, and
will also receive a lowered rate of interest during that time.

New York noteholders do have another choice though. Until
December 29, a few days from now, these noteholders may, if they
wish, trade their notes for bonds issued by the "Municipal
Assistance Corporation", or otherwise known as "MAC", on behalf
of New York City. These bonds cannot be cashed in for 10 years
or more, but they carry a higher rate of interest. And, oh yes,
there's one other little uncertainty: MAC is a so-called "moral
obligation agency", an idea given birth by Nelson Rockefeller and
his own lawyer John Mitchell, and its bonds are "moral obligation
bonds." Its promise to pay the bonds when they come due is not
backed up by a legal obligation on the part of New York City, New
York State, or anyone else. Either way, the person who simply
wants to cash in his City note as it comes due is now out of
luck, he can't do it; so New York City is in default.

Don't be misled by the fact that the major media under
Rockefeller control are not using that word "default" for the
time being. As I pointed out last month in my monthly AUDIO
LETTER No. 6, the dress rehearsal for default in New York some
weeks ago was used to give that word "default" a very apocalyptic
meaning. The word is therefore being saved for the right moment.

Meanwhile, the effect of this New York failure to pay is
already spreading through our economy. Municipalities all over
America, and even abroad, are suddenly finding it hard to sell
the bonds. As the municipal bond market dries up, so will funds
for public employees, projects, etc. The domino effect has
already started, but our advance revelations have made it
dangerous for them to highlight this just yet. But you can be
sure that the word "default" has not been so carefully given its
present frightening connotations without a purpose--and it may be
that we will all see that purpose within a matter of a few days.
A court ruling is due soon concerning the Constitutionality of
the so-called moratorium imposed by New York. Should it be ruled
unConstitutional, financial chaos will be the result in New York,
and that chaos will quickly be labeled "default."

There are a whole string of other time bombs like that too,
all ticking away. When the time is just right, the Rockefeller
Brothers can set off whichever one is the handiest. When they
do, the results will be the same, regardless of the exact timing.
Armed with this knowledge, I hope you have taken the necessary
steps to protect yourself, such as I described in my AUDIO BOOK

Meanwhile, gradualism continues to be the word for the step by
step actions of the Rockefeller Brothers; so if you watch the
Stock Market, for example, don't fall into the trap of reading
great significance into the daily up-and-down wiggles. What
counts is the month-to-month trend--and that is down. The Stock
Market crash actually began in July 1975, as I said it would, but
it does not yet suit the purposes of the Rockefeller Brothers for
this to be obvious to all. Instead, the overall market is
sinking downward in gradual, almost imperceptible phases. It is
crashing in slow motion like a bad dream.

Meanwhile most people--that is, those who do not specialize in
the Stock Market and financial matters--generally keep track of
little more than the Dow Jones industrial average. There are
nearly 2,000 stocks traded on the New York Stock Exchange but the
Dow index is an average of just 30 of them. They were chosen to
be representative of the whole Market, assuming no manipulation,
but that assumption is no longer correct. Very special attention
is paid to the manipulation of prices of these 30 stocks. As a
result, the real behavior of the Market can be completely hidden
from the general public. Whenever man is involved, races will be

Turning to the monetary picture, a development I first
revealed in April of this year has just happened. At the 1975
"International Gold and Monetary Conference" here in Washington,
D.C., I revealed confidential information to the effect that the
Soviet Union would soon be issuing an international gold ruble,
and just a few days ago it happened. The Soviet Union has
introduced their "chervonetz", or 10-ruble gold piece. It bears
the date 1975, and only 250,000 have been minted, 50,000 of which
are already here in the United States out of 125,000 to be
consigned to the United States. Under a 1923 Soviet law it is
legal tender, making it convertible. This new gold coin is an
attempt by the Russians for the first time in 52 years to
penetrate the world gold-coin market and to compete directly with
the "krugerrand" issued by South Africa. The chervonetz is about
one-quarter of the size and value of the krugerrand, which means
that South Africa will have to take measures to compete with it.

The other major event, supposedly in the monetary sphere, is
the Monetary Conference, so called, at Rambouillet Castle near
Paris late last month. It was a summit meeting of the Big
Six--the United States, France, Britain, West Germany, Italy, and
Japan, but please note that Canada was not there, and for very
good reasons.

First, here's what happened, then I will explain why it
happened, which is far more important.

Treasury Secretary Simon said on his way back from the meeting
which took place over the week-end of November 16, 1975, that a
compromise had been reached on exchange rates, among other
things. France wanted fixed rates, while the United States had
been campaigning for a "free" float to continue. The compromise
that was reached is just what I had told you it would be: stable
yet flexible rates of exchange, which they chose to call a
"managed float." Simon also said he hoped that, quote: "the
agreement will be approved at an international meeting in
January, and that Congress will readily approve necessary changes
in the Articles governing the operation of the International
Monetary Fund."

Now a "managed float" from a legal point of view does not
require any change in the Articles that govern the IMF unless it
changes the par value of gold. So what is brewing now is a
system of so-called "stable yet flexible rates of exchange"
indirectly tied to a par value of gold. I revealed in my monthly
AUDIO LETTER No. 5 for October 1975 that the plan is to repeg
gold at or about $195.00 per ounce, and this is still on track.
This, in effect, will amount to still another devaluation of the
dollar, and the official price of gold ($42.22) will be abolished
beginning early next year. Keep in mind that the private gold
markets will not be closed; and after this action, private gold
prices will go past the $195 mark. A leapfrog condition will
have been set in motion that will jack the price of gold higher
and higher, and the process will be intensified by the coming war
and world-wide economic problems. David Rockefeller's gold
skyrocket will be launched at last; but the 50-million ounces of
gold to be sold by the IMF will never reach the private market,
going instead to the central bankers by way of sale, auction, or
restitution. Five-million ounces of this, returned to the United
States under the restitution provision, will be used in an
attempt to continue to cover up the Fort Knox Gold Scandal along
with gold now being smuggled into the United States by the CIA
for the private coffers of the Rockefeller Brothers.

The biggest question about Rambouillet is: Why did the United
States compromise? The answer is that a "free-floating" system
would be too uncontrollable during the upcoming limited nuclear
war against the Arab OPEC nations which is targeted to begin late
in February 1976, just two months from now. So the United States
had to compromise to complete its preparations for this war.

What I am telling you, my friend, is a military secret, or was
until I revealed it in detail in my monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 6
last month. The code name for this military attack, by the way,
is "OPERATION COBRA", and preparations for it are moving rapidly.
Already the first detachment of crack United States Marines are
now in Germany ready for swift deployment into the Sinai, where
war will break out; and the build-up toward the staged
provocation to ignite the conflict--namely, an attack on the
so-called American advisers in the Sinai--is progressing
steadily. Only today, December 21, 1975, the latest step was
taken in this plan when a CIA-supported group made a provocative
attack on OPEC Oil Ministers at their headquarters in Vienna,
Austria. This is intended to lead, by stages, to reprisal
actions against the Americans stationed in the Sinai.


Now I turn briefly to Topic #3.

Topic #3--As I explained last month, the limited nuclear war
which is scheduled to begin soon in the Middle East is only a
part of a much larger picture. The Rockefeller Brothers have
designs on India, while the Soviet Union has its eyes on China.
In resource-rich Africa, both the Rockefellers and their Soviet
allies have an interest. So the real theater in the war now
brewing is Asia. After the OPEC oil wells are capped by the
nuclear strike, Russia's western flank (Europe) will be crippled
and Africa will be more easily finished off by the guerrilla
warfare already going on there. Oil-hungry Japan will be thrown
into the arms of Red China which, by the way, has just announced
it can now export oil; and the stage will be set for the big
Asian war that is to be the next round in the bloody game of
global monopoly. The strategy of all this was spelled out in my
monthly AUDIO LETTER No. 6 last month. My purpose now, however,
is simply to point out the basic nature of all this.

It is, my friend, a DRIVE FOR CONTROL--control of people, of
resources, of the entire world. Furthermore, it is a product of
unholy alliance between the State Socialists in the Soviet Union
and the Corporate Socialists in the United States, the
Rockefeller Brothers and their client followers.

Many people mistake the Rockefeller Brothers for capitalists,
but that is not at all what they are. David Rockefeller, for
example, has been quoted as saying, "I believe in the enterprise
system", but he does not say "free", much less "competitive
enterprise." The entire Rockefeller empire is built on the exact
opposite of that--monopolies and trusts. Their major
multinational corporations are an ingenious device for casting
off loyalties to any country, and they are already more powerful,
collectively, than most nations. The Rockefellers, you see, are
Corporate Socialists. Corporate Socialism and State Socialism
are nothing more than two sides of the same coin. Both boil down
to the same thing--dictatorships or near-dictatorships--enabling
a very few people to control everyone else. Once you grasp this
fact, the alliance between the Rockefellers and the Soviets will
no longer surprise you, nor will the fact that the Russian
Revolution in 1917 was financed by the Rockefeller interests.

The State Socialism of Nazi Germany also falls into place
since it, too, was just another version of the same pattern. In
all of these cases, as well as many others we see today, the
Corporate Socialist empire of the Rockefeller Brothers gains
handsomely--mineral riches, oil, and other rewards--in return for
cooperation with State Socialism.

Thus it is that Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, a
Rockefeller agent for 20 years and more, defends the Soviet Union
against charges of cheating on the so-called SALT Arms Limitation
agreement, but allows his out-going Ambassador to Canada to
publicly accuse our closest neighbor of being "no longer reliable
or to be trusted." Kissinger speaks not for you or me, but for
the Rockefeller Brothers; and to them, Russia is the ally, the
friend, while our close friends in Canada are the 'enemy', the
people not to be trusted, because Canada's government now knows
what is in the wind and they are taking all the necessary steps
to weather the storm. The Canadian government wants no part of
the coming war, monetary chaos, and all the rest of it, and has
privately said so to Kissinger in no uncertain terms. So Canada
has become 'unreliable', which means outside the circle of firm
Rockefeller control. Bravo for Canada! Long may she continue on
her independent course.

Ultimately the greedy misdeeds of the Rockefeller Brothers and
their allies will be their eventual undoing. Even now both
Nelson Rockefeller and Henry Kissinger have doomed themselves by
handling some of the gold that was taken out of Fort Knox. That
gold was contaminated by the radioactive plutonium-239 super
poison, and now their bodies are contaminated with it. Even
though they and the rest of the Rockefeller organization may well
succeed in destroying our Republic IF WE DO NOT ACT, they will
not live long to enjoy it. What poetic justice! Their dose is
even stronger than that received by the Congressmen and newsmen
who visited the Bullion Depository at Fort Knox in September
1974. Yes, eventually, the huge empire of the Rockefeller
Brothers and their allies will tear itself apart, and perhaps
destroy the world in the process. But meanwhile, IF WE DO NOT
ACT NOW, there will be untold suffering for millions--ourselves,
our children, and probably our children's children. Can we
possibly sit by and let that happen? Or do we act NOW, while we
still can, and take back our rightful control over our own
destinies? For me, there can be only one choice, and I hope for
YOU as well.

Until next month, this is Dr. Beter. I wish all of you a
blessed Christmas and a healthy, happy, holy New Year. May God
bless each and every one of you.

Back to Main Page of Dr. Peter Beter Audio Letters Serie